A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated national consideration pursuing an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier as well as the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved right into a very publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, request to create their loved ones residence. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place improvement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of founded people. Based on the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their planning authorization by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web-site, resulting in an encroachment on the Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such areas are issue to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, especially in a sensitive coastal environment for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially constructed, is in the correct position. Their lawful crew has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary initiatives via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In accordance with sworn proof referenced in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations, an image that has since become emblematic from the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't basically symbolic; they ended up meant to Get Visible evidence of the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Situations reported, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Among the most hanging descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception the wall prolonged into a location influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated in detail via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as visitors sought to understand the background and implications René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site of the case. On that date, the High Court read additional submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important second within the legal timeline.
With the core on the dispute is actually a disagreement about boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain which the wall, as built, goes over and above what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been called meticulous in his evaluation of arranging files, maps, and situations attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both stressed that their action is determined by issue for environmental safety and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A non-public look at, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've described their prolonged-standing link to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a pair basically endeavoring to establish a relatives home in accordance Using the regulation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Special Region of Conservation and say that each one works are already performed based on professional advice and authorized options. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into the sea during a storm, will not alter the underlying facts.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how planning disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for any scenario that numerous observers see as increasingly prevalent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation involving non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Times post about René Collier mentioned that the businessman had Beforehand been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental challenges, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty unique Qualified backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous While using the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waist-substantial drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by way of waistline-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to figure out whether the wall as created complies with arranging permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing ailments. But the human element continues to be central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other long after the lawful charges have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition, it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.